Everything We Know About ChatGPT Ads... So Far

Okay, we need to talk about ChatGPT getting ads. I know, I know—we all saw this coming eventually. The moment OpenAI started burning through billions in compute costs, the ads question wasn't "if" but "when." Well, "when" has arrived, and I've been piecing together every detail I can find because this might actually matter more than any of us want to admit.

Here's the thing: this isn't just another platform bolting ads onto their service. This is potentially the beginning of a complete rewiring of how advertising works inside the places where people make decisions. And if you're selling anything online, you're going to want to understand what's happening here.

The Basics (What We Actually Know)

Starting in the coming weeks, paid advertisements will appear within ChatGPT for users on free and Pro-tier plans in the United States. They're calling them "impression-based" rather than click-driven, which is marketing-speak for "you'll see the ad at the end of your conversation where it's contextually relevant, and that's the metric we're counting."

So imagine you're asking ChatGPT about running shoes for flat feet. You get your answer, and then below it—like a polite suggestion rather than an interruption—there's an ad for a specific shoe that happens to match your criteria. That's the theory, anyway.

What's interesting is what OpenAI is explicitly not doing. They've committed that ads won't influence the actual answers ChatGPT provides. Your conversation data won't be sold to advertisers. The ads slot in at the end, like a "by the way, if you're interested" rather than contaminating the response itself.

This matters because the entire value proposition of ChatGPT depends on users trusting it as neutral. The moment people suspect the AI is recommending products because someone paid for placement rather than because they're genuinely good? Game over. The product's utility collapses faster than you can say "search engine optimization."

The Pricing That Made Me Do a Double-Take

Here's where things get genuinely wild. Early reporting suggests OpenAI is seeking roughly $60 per thousand impressions. For context, that's approximately three times what you'd pay on Meta.

My initial reaction was "well, that's ambitious." But then I thought about it more (at 1 AM, obviously, because that's when all my best thinking happens), and it actually makes a weird kind of sense.

What are you buying with that $60? Not clicks. Not conversion tracking. Not detailed attribution models. OpenAI is essentially selling you presence inside someone's decision-making process. It's less "drive traffic to your site" and more "be in the room when they're figuring out what to buy."

This is a fundamentally different value proposition than traditional digital advertising. And honestly? Either it's genius positioning or wildly overconfident. Possibly both. (The eternal optimist and the skeptic in my brain are arm-wrestling again.)

The Trust Problem Everyone's Dancing Around

Let me be real with you: ChatGPT's download numbers have plateaued. We're looking at roughly 573 million downloads in September 2025, dipping slightly in October, stabilizing through year-end. This isn't decline—but it's not the hyper-growth phase anymore either.

When a platform hits this stage, introducing something as visibly commercial as advertising is... not without risk. And the competitive context doesn't help. Google's Gemini has been growing faster than ChatGPT year-over-year. Sensor Tower estimates suggest Gemini's monthly active users increased 360% compared to ChatGPT's 280% growth through 2025.

For casual users—the ones who aren't deeply invested in the OpenAI ecosystem—the switching cost is basically zero. If ChatGPT introduces friction through ads while Gemini maintains an ad-free experience, migration becomes a rational choice rather than an emotional one.

I've been lurking in Reddit threads about this (as one does), and the sentiment is pretty consistent: people value ChatGPT specifically because it feels different from the ad-saturated web. One comment that stuck with me: "I don't want an AI that tries to sell me something when I'm asking personal or sensitive questions. It totally kills the sense of privacy and neutrality."

Now, user complaints are normal when any platform introduces monetization. But the difference here is that the alternatives are actually getting good. This isn't 2015 Facebook where you could complain all you wanted but where else were you going to go? The escape routes exist now.

What This Actually Means If You Sell Things Online

Okay, let's get practical. Because I know you're not reading this for abstract industry analysis—you want to know what to do about it.

First: don't panic-buy ChatGPT ads tomorrow. The rollout is limited, the pricing isn't finalized, and we don't even know what the full targeting and optimization options will look like. This is OpenAI testing whether advertising can exist inside a trusted assistant without destroying the trust that makes the assistant valuable. That experiment requires iteration, not aggressive scale.

Second: think about what "presence in decision-making" actually means for your products. This is different from capturing someone who's already searching for your product category. It's about being visible during the research phase when preferences are still forming. If you sell something that benefits from that kind of upstream influence—complex purchases, products where education matters, anything where "I didn't know this existed but now I want it" is a viable pathway—this could be interesting.

Third: your brand clarity matters more than ever. In traditional digital advertising, creative execution and targeting can compensate for unclear positioning. In conversational environments, a brand that can't explain its differentiation in plain language is going to struggle regardless of ad spend. The AI is synthesizing information from multiple sources. If your value proposition is muddy in those sources, it'll be muddy in the ad context too.

Fourth: start thinking about how you appear in organic conversations, not just paid placements. The way ChatGPT describes your product category, the reviews it's pulling from, the comparison frameworks it uses—all of that shapes how any paid presence gets interpreted. Your content strategy, review management, and third-party credibility all feed into advertising effectiveness in ways that traditional digital marketing hasn't really required.

The Measurement Headache Nobody's Prepared For

Here's the unsexy reality that's going to frustrate a lot of marketing teams: the metrics you're used to? They might not translate.

OpenAI is talking about high-level performance indicators. Total views. Total clicks. That's... it. No detailed attribution. No conversion tracking (at least not at launch). No audience segmentation beyond what the conversation naturally provides.

If you're a brand that's built your entire advertising operation around last-click attribution and ROAS dashboards, this is going to feel like flying blind. You're essentially trusting that presence in the decision-making process translates into outcomes you can't directly measure.

Is that insane? Maybe. But also... how confident are we that our current attribution models actually reflect reality? (Don't answer that. I already know it keeps some of you up at night too.)

The brands that figure out how to measure "did this influence decisions?" rather than "did this generate clicks?" are probably going to have an advantage here. Whether that measurement framework exists yet is a different question entirely.

The Bigger Picture (Or: What This Actually Signals)

ChatGPT adding ads fits into a larger pattern that's been developing for a while now. Google's been pulling commercial visibility closer to the research phase through AI Mode and Gemini integration. Amazon keeps expanding advertising within product discovery. Shopify's building tools that position brands earlier in consideration.

What connects all of this is the recognition that the point of maximum influence is shifting upstream—from the moment of purchase to the process of figuring out what to purchase. Advertising is becoming less about capturing expressed intent and more about shaping the criteria people use to evaluate options.

That's a profound shift if you think about it. We've spent twenty years optimizing for "someone searched for my product, put my ad in front of them." The new game is "someone is trying to figure out what they need, be part of how they think about the category."

I'm not going to pretend I know exactly how this plays out. But the direction seems clear enough that ignoring it feels unwise.

What I'm Watching

A few things I'll be tracking as this develops:

User retention post-ad-introduction. Do people actually leave, or do they complain and stay? (History suggests the latter, but ChatGPT's competitive context is different than most platforms.)

How aggressively competitors respond. If Gemini or Claude explicitly position themselves as "the ad-free alternative," that changes the calculus significantly.

What the actual targeting and optimization options look like. The difference between "contextually relevant ads" and "sophisticated audience segmentation" is enormous for how useful this is to advertisers.

Whether this changes how ChatGPT's shopping features develop. They've already been building product comparison and recommendation capabilities. Adding advertising on top of that creates some interesting (and potentially problematic) dynamics.

The Bottom Line

ChatGPT getting ads was inevitable. Whether it changes everything or becomes a footnote depends on execution we haven't seen yet.

For right now: pay attention, don't overreact, and start thinking about how your brand shows up in conversational contexts beyond just "what keywords are we bidding on." The infrastructure is shifting. The only real choice is whether you adapt deliberately or get adapted to.

And if you figure out how to measure "presence in decision-making" as a KPI, please let me know. My spreadsheets are getting weird and I could use the help.

• A practical, copy-paste playbook for Claude Cowork. Ten real workflows that save time and money, from inbox zero and expense audits to deep research and investment due diligence.

• Google Search just got more visual. Gemini 3 Pro powers interactive AI answers that simulate trade-offs like weather vs crowds, turning search into a decision tool, not a list of links.

• A high-end Nano Banana Pro prompt for building a polished 9-frame product storyboard. Editorial, design-led, and portfolio-ready without drifting from the original brand identity.

• ChatGPT shopping results are heavily shaped by Google Shopping queries, not just conversational search. If you want product visibility in AI carousels, Google Shopping optimization is now critical.

• Screaming Frog + Google Search Console lets SEOs audit indexation at scale. Pull coverage, crawl status and indexability directly into your crawl without checking URLs one by one.

• Google’s AI Overview hallucinated customer support info, sending six months of angry users to the wrong startup. A cautionary tale of AI summaries quietly breaking real businesses.

• In an era of infinite AI content, taste is the real moat. Judgment, framing and editorial restraint now matter more than volume, templates or production speed.

• This deep Claude masterclass shows how to build agents, automate SEO, create apps, and run an AI-powered operation end to end.

🔗 GrowEasy: Kickstart a lead generation campaign on Facebook and Instagram in less than 5 minutes using AI.

📊 Syncly - Surface real customer pains with AI feedback analysis

📝 Flipner - Create masterful content faster than ever with this AI assist

📧 Shortwave: An AI tool that searches your entire email history, writes drafts in your voice, schedules meetings, and saves you an hour every day.

📋 Syncly - Surface real customer pains with AI feedback analysis.

⚙️ Doclime - Get answers from your documents

😍It was great, all I needed

🙂Good, not great

🙄It sucked